ADVERTISEMENT

Banaszak Resigns.

Interesting. That means the new coach may keep some or all of the current staff. Gonna be interesting to see who they choose as the coach and who gets to stick around as well
 
I would imagine (HOPE) that the search has been ongoing through back channels. Need to get the right guy, but need to be able to act fairly quickly due to recruiting. I can only imagine a couple guys would have a shot of sticking around.

If Benny ends up being the choice, would think Farison and maybe Coleman on D would have a shot at hanging around, though I would think they both may have a shot with a lot new head coaches. I can see the arguments for and against Benzel.

Anyways, we be interesting to see what happens.
 
Interesting. That means the new coach may keep some or all of the current staff. Gonna be interesting to see who they choose as the coach and who gets to stick around as well

Where did you see that current assistants might stay? Or was it speculation? I'd like to see the entire defensive staff stay and perhaps a McVey.

Sad to see Banny go. He is a really likable guy with a great story but being likable does not keep you around in this business. Has Miller followed suit? Be a shame if the guy that essentially caused the Banaczak downfall thinks he is going to stick around? Look up "fake it until you make it" in the dictionary and you would see a picture of Miller.

I finally was able to get some inside scoop. I heard some very disturbing things last week in regard to the Oline coach and his treatment of players. I will refrain from posting them but if true I hope he is gone.

Unsure how it works? If Banny goes does the staff too? Do they all need to resign on their own? Does AD Coleman need to keep a couple coaches on payroll to keep things running until a new HC is picked, and then assume it is up to that coach to retain them or not?

If Miller and Richardson are somehow retained expect about 30 transfers.

If Farison is not retained that number might jump.

I hope the University see's what is best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jnbxu
Where did you see that current assistants might stay? Or was it speculation? I'd like to see the entire defensive staff stay and perhaps a McVey.

Sad to see Banny go. He is a really likable guy with a great story but being likable does not keep you around in this business. Has Miller followed suit? Be a shame if the guy that essentially caused the Banaczak downfall thinks he is going to stick around? Look up "fake it until you make it" in the dictionary and you would see a picture of Miller.

I finally was able to get some inside scoop. I heard some very disturbing things last week in regard to the Oline coach and his treatment of players. I will refrain from posting them but if true I hope he is gone.

Unsure how it works? If Banny goes does the staff too? Do they all need to resign on their own? Does AD Coleman need to keep a couple coaches on payroll to keep things running until a new HC is picked, and then assume it is up to that coach to retain them or not?

If Miller and Richardson are somehow retained expect about 30 transfers.

If Farison is not retained that number might jump.

I hope the University see's what is best.
What typically happens is the head coach resigns, the search for his replacement begins, and current assistants start looking for new jobs. So some will leave on their own terms by getting hired to other staffs.

When the new coach is hired, he'll likely interview any remaining assistants to determine if they're worth keeping and if they're a fit for his staff and style. Nine times out of ten, they won' t be kept unless there's a prior relationship or significant value. If RMU hires an offensive-minded coach and that coach has a previous relationship with Scott Farison, for example, it might be increase the odds of Farison staying.

The odds are higher of some retention if RMU hires someone with previous ties to the program, too. Hank Fraley, Scott Benzel, etc. may want someone with institutional knowledge to stick around. And if there's any retention at all, it'd only be the defensive side of the ball. I can't imagine anyone of the offensive staff keeping their jobs.

But if it's a complete outside hire, I'd expect everyone to be gone and a whole new staff to be brought in.
 
The website article says that RMU is going on a national search for a replacement. That must mean the AD is serious about getting a quality guy in there. Good possibility Dr. Howard might throw his two cents in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: irish_buffalo
The website article says that RMU is going on a national search for a replacement. That must mean the AD is serious about getting a quality guy in there. Good possibility Dr. Howard might throw his two cents in.
I think it means Dr Howard is serious...
 
I wish Coach Banaszak nothing but the best. He is a wonderful man. Coaches need a lot of pieces to fall into place in order to be successful. Sometimes, even for good coaches, the pieces just do not fall into place. For whatever the reasons, the circumstances just did not translate into wins on Saturday for John.

I feel certain that Craig Coleman and President Howard will have a good process to consider all viable candidates. They will do it the right way. There will be a lot of good, qualified candidates. I suspect it will be someone with no previous connections to the program. There will be a lot of speculation and rumors. There will be complaints that the process is taking too long. There will be rumors that a lot of quality players are planning to transfer. In the end, RMU will hire a coach that we can all get excited about. Once hired, he will talk with the players and get them excited about playing for him. He will hit the recruiting trail and excite potential recruits about a new era at RMU. On this forum, we will discuss in depth each hiring of assistant coaches and each new recruit. There will be a new season next fall, and we will look to a brighter future.

With regard to the current assistant coaches, that will be up to the new head coach. Typically, new college head coaches will bring in a new staff. He may keep one or two for continuity with recruiting. At this point, I feel certain that Craig Coleman nor anyone else knows which, if any assistants, will be retained.
 
  • Like
Reactions: irish_buffalo
Some background on how this may play out, based on previous hires.

Mark Schmidt left RMU for St. Bonaventure on April 10, 2007. Coleman spent two weeks interviewing candidates, brought back finalists to campus for interviews - including one with an internal search committee that included one or two basketball players - and hired Mike Rice on April 26.

When Rice left for Rutgers, it was late in the college coaching carousel. Rice was officially hired on May 6, 2010. Andy Toole was promoted just five days later, and I'm pretty sure there was a weekend in-between and RMU didn't want to announce it over the weekend.

So Coleman tends to move quickly on high profile jobs. I'm sure Chris Howard will have a lot of input and others at RMU will probably be involved in interviews, but Coleman will likely lead the search.

I think it's also revealing that Coleman immediately announced a national search and that no one has been announced as the "steward" of the program in the interim. That tells me that while Scott Farison may be given a courtesy interview, it's more likely that there will be an outside hire unless Farison has something innovative up his sleeve.

It'll be really interesting to see what kind of names pop up for this. The university definitely supports athletics, so that won't be an issue for potential candidates. And the recruiting base is solid. I'd say head coach salary, assistant coach salary pool, overall scholarship money and facilities might be the biggest determining factors in the quality of candidates.
 
To me, a "national search" just means the job is open to all qualified candidates to be considered. It used to be a big deal when the words "national search" were used. In this internet age, it is really meaningless. Every job opening could be classified as such.
 
Think about this from Dr.Howard's perspective. He's a football guy, played at Air Force, he's on the college football playoff committee, his last school had a respectable football program. His current school's football program shat the bed the last seven years. You know he can't be thrilled about the state of RMU football.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jnbxu
I hope Dr. Howard is extremely involved in this. I am sure I mentioned it here, but have in regular conversation also, that with all of the contacts he has, a lot of coaches may apply, give RMU a look that otherwise would not have. Having a strong, supportive president is a huge plus RMU has going for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jnbxu
Any news on the first wave of turnover yet? Did some of the assistants get left go or "resign" as well yesterday?
 
Have not heard anything regarding the Coaches. I just truly hope the search does not drag out too long. From one of the articles it stated that applications were already rolling in, so that is great sign.

Need to get someone in there that the guys believe and buy in to. Hopefully can keep roster turnover low. I am actually really looking forward to the whole process and in particular whomever the new HC names as QB and OL line coaches.

I personally think there is enough talent at OL to develop, might not be as quick as next year, but shortly there after if most of them stay.

Know it will be up to new coach in all likely hood, but would love for Farison and Coleman get a shot with the new regime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: irish_buffalo
Any news on the first wave of turnover yet? Did some of the assistants get left go or "resign" as well yesterday?
My understanding is that OL coach Andrew Richardson is out. Not sure if he's taking another job or his contract wasn't renewed or what the case may be. Regardless, he's done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: irish_buffalo
http://rmucolonials.com/coaches.aspx?path=football

Well that answered some questions as to who is still on staff.
Yup. RMU doesn't update that directory until changes happen.

So Mike Miller is gone along with Richardson. No surprise, really.

I'd imagine the others will be kept on until they find other jobs or are interviewed and hired by the new head coach. Notable that all of them are pretty young, too, except for Farison and Coleman. McVay, Stephens-Howling, Sonnie and Brown all have just a couple years of coaching experience overall, while DiMichele has a bit more experience but is still a pretty young guy.
 
I said it before and I will say it again RMU is a very enticing place for any coach looking to make his mark and move on to better things.

The league is a relatively weak FCS league but you get an automatic bid. You are in an area where there is plentiful talent falling through the FBS school cracks on a yearly basis and Robert Morris is a nice campus with great facilities (Especially with new arena) to draw kids.

Regardless if Farison or an outsider, as everyone has mentioned, this program needs a breath of fresh air and some positive focus which will solve half the problem. The talent is there to compete right away, I am fully convinced of that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jnbxu
Irish, agree with you regarding the talent. Need a high level QB SPECIFIC coach and a high level O-line coach. The pedigree seems to be there, they just need developed and a system tailored to current teams strengths.

Edit to add: Seems the admin made a clear distinction of where the problems were with the coaches getting rid of Miller and Richardson. I know someone posted if they stayed, there would be a large outflow of players, so glad to see Dr. Coleman and Dr. Howard acted quickly.
 
BTW, the open position of head coach, football was posted on the RMU jobs' website early yesterday. That may seem to be a bit of a formality for this type of position, but it indicates to me that RMU is wasting no time in moving the process forward. My guess as to the timing of naming a new coach, two weeks the absolute soonest, three weeks, likely, four to five weeks the latest. We will get antsy at times thinking why is it taking so long, we are missing out on recruits, players are planning to leave, etc. Coleman's position will be that it is better to take a bit of extra time now in order to try to hire the best person for the position.
 
Hiring Palko is no guarantee of success. He's the popular hire. A successful local high school coach who can bring in local talent. It's the sentimental choice. But does he want to deal with the college game? Can he adjust to that game? Palko's not exactly a spring chicken. I personally would rather have a coach who knows the college game, and has coached it for a significant amount of time, and has had some success at it, rather than bringing in a coach who has coached high school most of his career and his only exposure to the college game was as a grad assistant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: M4Fam
At this level, even more so with the scholarship limit in the NEC, a KEY component of coaching is scholarship management. People may not agree with me on the importance of this, but I feel it is super important that the new coach have experience in this.
 
I can see Palko applying but not near a top candidate. RMU is putting together a list that includes talking to some potential FBS coaches on their interest. RMU is going to swing for the fences at first in hopes of putting in a huge name with a ton of experience.
 
ORMC,
Have you heard anything regarding salary? Assume if they are going to swing for the fences they have a larger salary pool built up? Makes sense to go for it, if they say no, move on quickly. Some of the names mentioned earlier could be hired quickly I think if they miss out on any potential large targets.
 
I have not heard any of the details to that degree. But being RMU is going to have a limited budget compared to other programs, can you load up the contract with incentives / bonuses.
 
I like the resume. I have a buddy who lives in California tell me one time, man it is really easy for you to come out here but it is tough as hell for me to come back there (referring to weather). Looks like this kids next move is up the chain as a coordinator first. But at this point I'll try not to get picky.

I also like Coach Dunn out of California PA as someone mentioned on the other thread. I like the fact that he already has experience as a HC and knows the area landscape. Is what I do not like is he is an offensive guy. Much like the coordinator from San Diego with former OC's it is always about their offense. When it comes to Dunn his offense is pure spread and chuck the ball around. I believe California's top two running backs ran for around 400 yards last year and their defense gave up some big points in big games (wins & losses). I prefer just a bit more ground game and solid defense. Just me. Am I getting picky? ;)

Defensive guys have always and will continue to make the best HC's. I still like Benzel but I'm sure there are plenty of unkowns out there that are just as good who will be applying.
 
ADVERTISEMENT